Estimated reading time: 7 minutes
First-person narration is a mode of storytelling in which the narrator is a character in the story and tells the story from their point of view. Just like in the real world, the narrator only knows their own thoughts, as opposed to a third-person omniscient narrator who knows the thoughts of every character.
Table of Contents:
• The pros of writing in first person
• It adds a level of realism
• You can add depth and complexity with an unreliable narrator
• You can plunge readers into your narrator’s psychology
• It’s great for voice
• It’s great for humor
• Pitfalls of a first-person narrative
• It can limit the perspective of the story
• There can be too much “I”
• It can lead to passive action
Authors and readers alike love first person because the technique instantly plunges the reader into the world and the mind of the narrator, and books told in first person are often a feast for lovers of voice. But first-person narration also has its limitations and its pitfalls. If handled badly, first-person narrative can be a real turn-off.
If you’re looking to write a book in first person, here are some tips on how to tap into what’s great about it while avoiding some common mistakes.
The pros of writing in first person
Let first explore the many pros of writing with first-person narration.
It adds a level of realism
One advantage of writing in first person is that your narrative will immediately sound less like a story and more like a memoir. By having your narrator use pronouns like I and we, your story has a greater degree of verisimilitude — even if your narrator admits that their memory may be faulty. Consider the opening sentence of Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut: “All of this happened, more or less.”
You can add depth and complexity with an unreliable narrator
One of the most fun aspects of writing in first-person is being able to use an unreliable narrator. An unreliable narrator is a narrator who the audience knows or suspects lack credibility. This can lead readers to speculate how much of the story is true and how much of it is either a lie (as in the case of many thrillers) or simply the product of someone who has no way of knowing the facts.
This can make a story much more interesting than if the narrator is simply telling the truth. Flowers for Algernon, for example, is told by a narrator whose intelligence fluctuates throughout the story, making it clear that he often doesn’t understand what’s happening, which can lead to dramatic irony.
You can plunge readers into your narrator’s psychology
Character is king when it comes to storytelling. You may have the most intricately constructed plot and the tightest structure in the world, but if your story lacks relatable, three-dimensional characters, readers won’t care.
With first-person narration, you have a much greater opportunity to give your readers what they want by putting the entire story in your narrator’s hands.
Personally, I love first-person narration because, by injecting my narrator’s personality into every sentence, it allows me to bring every single detail to life. In my novel, The Dragon Squisher, for example, my narrator is told he must embark on a hike.
Hiking is an unpleasant activity. It is a demented perversion of that elegant and civilized institution known as walking. The phrase “to go for a walk” implies a pleasant stroll on well-paved roads with your friends or family. One might even get to hold hands under the moonlight with a romantic interest. (I never have, but I’m told that it happens.) “Going for a hike,” on the other hand, involves hauling a heavy backpack over miles of rugged terrain with zealous nature enthusiasts who feel compelled to point out how beautiful everything is.
Had I written the book in third person, this passage would have required dialogue and would have been awkward and less amusing.

It’s great for voice
Readers love authors with a strong writer’s voice. And while you can write with a strong voice in third person (consider The Road or 1984), it’s so much easier to deliver a voicey story in first-person. Here’s an example from my book, The Gazoon Heist.
But then she looked at me. And my stomach. It did that thing my stomach does whenever Margot Higginbottom looks at me, letting me know, in no uncertain terms, that it is tremendously displeased with the current situation. And I found it very difficult to think. So instead of saying “I think you are a beauty to behold” or some such thing, what I said to her was, “I like your head.”
Now, I don’t know about you, but if a giant lug like myself walked up to you and blurted out “I like your head,” you would be forgiven if you expected my follow-up sentence to be, “It would look nice on my shelf.”
It’s great for humor
Some of the funniest books ever written, like The Hitchhikers’ Guide to the Galaxy, are written in third person. But for me, writing in first person gives me an opportunity to make every sentence funny. The simplest thing can make your narrator recall a funny tidbit or have them muse humorously. This is from my book, Superlosers.
Had this young boy been named Jonathan, I’m sure he would have been paraded about as a fine example of America’s youth. But Bdonathan? That is a child destined to a life of spray-painting bathroom walls with poorly rendered images of men’s naughty bits.
Pitfalls of a first-person narrative
First-person narration does have its limitations and dangers. In fact, many of the qualities that can make it such a thrilling way to tell a story can be the very things that can make readers want to close a book.
It can limit the perspective of the story
By its very nature, a story told in first person requires your narrator to be present in every scene. So, it’s hard, awkward, or impossible to tell about events that happen “off camera.” Yes, you can preface certain passages with disclaimers like, “Now I wasn’t there for this part, but I was later told…” But that often feels awkward, and it’s not the kind of thing you can do very often in a single story.
This limitation can be used to your advantage, of course. It can be a great device for mystery or horror in which the narrator only knows what the reader knows — especially if written in the present tense.
If you find one narrator too confining, but you still want that first-person-narrative thrill, you can use multiple narrators. Gillian Flynn’s hit novel Gone Girl uses two narrators. Be careful not to use too many first-person narrators. Two is fine, but beyond that, things can get confusing for your readers. There are exceptions, however. The hit YA mystery One of Us Is Lying by Karen M. McManus uses four narrators, so it can be done.
There can be too much “I”
When writing in first-person, it’s very easy to begin every sentence with the words “I” or “we,” and this can be monotonous for your readers. Be sure to mix things up. Here is a paragraph from One of Us Is Lying that doesn’t use a single I or we.
Simon gets up and grabs a cup from a stack on the counter, filling it with water from the tap. He heads back to his seat and puts the cup on his desk, but seems distracted by Nate’s methodical writing. “Dude,” he says, kicking his sneaker against the leg of Nate’s desk. “Seriously. Did you put those phones in our backpacks to mess with us?”
It can lead to passive action
First-person can lead to use of the passive voice: “I saw the door open and heard an unearthly scream.” In this example, the reader is watching the narrator experience these things, which puts too much distance between the reader and the action. To avoid this, eliminate filter words (“I saw,” “I heard,” “I noticed,” etc.). “The door opened. An unearthly scream pierced the room,” is much more effective.
There are a ton of great books out there written in first person — The Chicago Public Library assembled a list, and Book Riot has published “50 Must-Read First-Person Books.” Read some of these classics and give it a try!








I’m encouraged by your instructive comments. As a retired academic, I did a course in creative writing when I had the idea to write my first novel from which my biggest “take home message” was about voice – mainly 1st person vs “fly on the wall” or what you called an omniscient narrator. My historical novel spans 100 years and I ended up structuring it in 8 sections using a different person’s voice in each section. The 1st, 5th and last section is in the voice of my central character, something I managed by the narrative starting in 1888 then section 2 going back in time to 1828 then proceeding chronologically to the end in 1928. There were so many times when reading my draft that I’d realise “she couldn’t know that”, etc. I used two-way letter writing, reading newspaper articles and conversations to “fill in the gaps” of what the 1st person character couldn’t otherwise know, and memory recall to provide info about past life experiences. But I liked the fact that I could genuinely reveal the thoughts and feelings of each “1st person” character. I feel that this approach produced a work, ‘Hope’, a family saga set largely in Australia, 1828-1928, in which readers can better understand those characters and the times in which they were living. Thanks Scott.
I knew and workd with C. F. Kettering. how to best relate that relationship.
I knew and worked for a very famous person, C. F. Kettering, in a direct perso-to person, relationship. I have been writing a book about that relationship for ten years. Any suggestions on how to best accomplish that?
Leon Uris intermittently used chapters in both first and third in “Trinity.” A little awkward to read initially, but it offered different perspectives of its story arcs.
As for myself, thanks to this article I better understand the often needless “I heard, I saw, I said” filter words I am often guilty of using.
There. I said it.
Hey, Scott. You hit just about all of the points both pro and con for using the first person. I’ve written books in both the first and third person POVs. One advantage with the first person is that it provides an immediate identification between the reader and the narrator The reader is right there in the narrator’s shoes. It’s ideal for a mystery plot where the reaer is trying to solve the puzzle along with the narrator..Conversely, it’ s easier to develop suspense with a third person narrator, which is why most thrillers are written in that point of view. For me, the choice is a simple one. Figure out what type of story you want to tell. If the plot is character driven, you’re probably better off using the first person. If it’s plot driven, then use the third.
Who do i contact to set up a personal narrative of my memoir?
I prefer doing the audio myself.
Thank you, “ I “ Medecin
Good stuff!
I love first person view because I am a very direct writer and very passionate about my story and the character within. To a fault, I sometimes lack a more descriptive environment in which to place my character. This I am working on. Meanwhile, I go direct and passionate and my readers love that.
How does all this apply to a memoir? It would be almost impossible to write my memoir books without first-person dialogue. Would readers be turned off by several paragraphs of dialogue between me and someone else in the story?\Thanks for all your help!
Sandra CH Smith
I don’t like first person view. It often reads unrealistically since people rarely remember, notice, or think like that. Or it reads like a diary. Other people’s diaries are rarely interesting unless you aren’t supposed to read them. Plus, it is such a narrow view of what is happening. I would rather see the big picture. Rotating first person is my least favorite. That’s narrow and confusing. I rarely just happen to run out of time to read at the end of a chapter. So, when I pick up later, I have to go back and see who “I” is supposed to be for this chapter.
I believe first-person in present tense is effective as it’s not a memoir, but an active series of events the reader gets to experience along with the narrator.
Hi Scott!
Thanks for reminding us to use first person cautiously. My first fictional WIP has two narrating protagonists. A “nearly-nine” girl in Norway and a visiting professor/family historian alternate chapters from their diaries, in present tense, in 1989. They help each other solve puzzles: her ancient inscription; his 3 genealogical enigmas, including a possible murder in 1828 and an unexplained death in 1888. I’ve managed 44,000 words, about half, so far.
Hope a bit of critiquing from a beginner isn’t a presumption.
The point about too many sentences beginning with “I” and “we” is important, but the example only shows avoidance of “filter words” as mentioned in your next point. More strenuous rewriting involves a leading phrase or clause before the pronoun, or, if it fits the tone and voice, omitting it. (“Don’t know why she died. Yet.”
Your last point seems to be the same as the previous one. The example shows again a simple statement of the event; the reader knows it’s the narrator’s experience.
This last paragraph mislabels your advice: you’ve said nothing about the passive voice. “I heard a scream” is distant, as you say, but is as much in the active voice as “A scream pierced the room.” The passive voice might say: “My ears were pierced by a scream,” and that would be far too distant.
Many of your articles have been useful, and I look forward to more of them.
Mike Thompson.