“The best is oftentimes the enemy of the good; and many a good book has remained unwritten… because there floated before the mind’s eye the ideal of a better or a best.” – R. C. Trench, 1861

In 1861, people had the luxury of contemplating ideas in elegant language like the quote above. Today, we consume sound bites and acronyms because there’s too much on our plate to linger. GEMO — Good Enough, Move On — is the contemporary interpretation of Trench’s wisdom.

Sometimes you need your best

If you’re opening someone’s body up with a scalpel, you have a moral and legal obligation to be the best surgeon you can be and do the best operation you’re capable of.

If you’re driving a race car at over 100 MPH on a crowded track, you owe it to yourself and your fellow drivers to focus your attention completely on being the best driver you can.

If a friend or family member is facing a life-altering trauma, you need to be fully present and compassionate to be the best witness you can be.

If you’re polishing and perfecting a manuscript or query to send to an agent, editor, or contest and grant judges, the writing must be the best work you can do.

But when you’re not operating on someone, racing the Indy 500, helping a loved one through a crisis, or putting the finishing touches on a manuscript, the best just gets in the way.

Sometimes you need GEMO

When you’re developing an idea, researching, drafting, revising, recruiting readers, and getting feedback, “good enough” makes it possible to keep showing up and moving on.

Paralyzed by perfection

If you refuse to accept good enough, you can’t move on. If you make writing a matter of “I’ll do my best or do nothing,” you’ll end up doing nothing most of the time because you simply can’t be your best all the time (or even most of the time). If you were your best all the time, by definition, that would just be your average.

You can’t let perfectionism get in the way. Well actually, you can – it’s just not effective or satisfying to let it get in your way. I truly wish I’d been more vulnerable, taken more risks, made more mistakes, and fallen on my face a lot more often earlier in my career. But with luck and persistence, I can do that now.

Fail better next time

Thank god first ideas don’t have to be brilliant; they only have to be good enough to give you a place to move on from.

Most first ideas are clichéd, awkward, and incomplete. If you’re looking for brilliance, first ideas and first drafts are downright pitiful failures.

You’re going to make mistakes – some minor, some major. Depending on which meme you look at, there are seven amateur, 10 fatal, 23 common, and 100 avoidable mistakes that are going to kill your first chapter, drive your editor crazy, or prove you’re a worthless wanna-be.

The fact that everyone makes mistakes probably won’t make your own mistakes easier to accept. In my book, Around the Writer’s Block, I refer to “gamma rays” when it should say “gamma waves.” I can laugh about it now, but I cringed the first time – okay, honestly the first fifteen times – I saw it.

With a little luck, persistence and a whole lot of hard work, you will still fail to achieve brilliance, but your next failure can be a little better than the last.

Moving through messy imperfection

Every draft is a messy approximation of what you wanted to write. You must revise and rewrite. And once you start revising, you have to guess when to stop because you could revise endlessly. At some point, you have to call it done, even though it never is.

With luck, persistence and hard work, you can transform a series of failures into something that satisfies you. The only alternative to making a series of failures that gradually approach what you set out to do is the ultimate failure: the failure to try at all.

The creative process is mysterious and frustrating at times because writing requires intuiting what the non-verbal, metaphorical, image-based part of your cortex wants to express. Ideas seem to appear out of nowhere because they appear when your conscious mind finally gets what the non-conscious mind has been shouting for days, metaphorically speaking of course.

You’re going to have false starts – ideas that don’t pan out, drafts that don’t go anywhere, snippets you never quite figure out what to do with, tantalizing images that appear when you can’t write them down only to disappear when you can, haunting you forever with what might have been.

There’s no certainty about when to call a false start and move on and when to keep experimenting and playing.

You’re going to have brilliant insights and mediocre clichéd ideas and some stinky brain farts. The trick is you won’t know what you’ve got at first. You have to risk showing your potentially stinky, clichéd ideas to others to find out. And even then, you can’t be sure because sometimes advisors with the best intentions make mistakes and give misdirected advice.

In my graduate program, one of my mentors who I deeply respected told me point-blank that a serious piece of fiction simply could not have a dog as the narrator. Good thing she didn’t tell Garth Stein that when he was first playing around with the idea that became The Art of Racing in the Rain. Even better, Garth Stein didn’t listen when people undoubtedly told him it was a SBD (silent, but deadly) fart of an idea.

You’re going flub up, make a mess, and embarrass yourself. In public. In print. On the Internet, where nothing bad ever really disappears, no matter how much you try to delete it. You’ll have nights when you’ll lie awake, torturing yourself with thoughts of “Oh my God! Why did I do that?”

The power of failure

In “The Power of Failure,” an essay in The Soul of Creativity, Eric Maisel warns us that if we don’t talk openly about failure, it will be devastating when we fail.

“If we do not understand that failure, mistakes, missteps, wrong turns, bad ideas, shoddy workmanship, half-baked theories, and other sad events are part of the process, if we romanticize the process and make believe that creativity comes with a happy face, then when we encounter our own rotten work we will be forced to conclude that we do not have what it takes. But we have what it takes. What it takes is learning and recovering from our mistakes.”

You have the power to fail in your writing. Seize that power. Make the most of your mistakes, decide which are good enough to move on with, and forsake the pursuit of the best.

 

Hybrid Author Game Plan

 

Related Posts
How to know when you’re done writing your novel
How to fail as a writer
Revising your novel – make it a playground, not a torture chamber
Overcome your inner critic
Radical revision: four ways to blow up and rebuild your novel

 

Rosanne Bane

About Rosanne Bane

Rosanne Bane has written 1 posts in this blog.

Rosanne Bane is author of Around the Writer’s Block: Using Brain Science to Solve Writer’s Resistance. A veteran teaching artist, Rosanne has helped thousands of writers understand why it’s so hard (at times) to do the very thing they love to do and what to do about that resistance. Rosanne’s blog, BaneOfYourResistance, is one of TheWriteLife.com’s Top 100 for writers in 2016.

18 thoughts on ““Good Enough” May Be The Best Thing For Your Writing

  1. What a great article, it hit all my sore spots. After reading through this article a couple of times, I, now, have the courage to make time for imperfections. I will fail and I will move forward. Thank you.

    1. Rosanne Bane says:

      Thank you S. J. I’m gratified to hear you are courageously making time to “fail better.” Imperfection is a much more achievable aspiration for me. 😉

  2. Michael Nunn says:

    Something always puzzles me. That is the question of when have readers become the experts? Good enough for what? If a person picks up a book and finds it interesting to read, that’s good enough for me. There are so many writers and so many styles of writing. No wonder people just get exasperated making up their minds. The writers feel the same way also.

    Note that writers are human beings also, with their different views and concepts. If you find a book that you’d like to read, go for it. Remember, each person’s opinion and how he/she looks at thing should be the bond that draws the reader and author together.

    1. Rosanne Bane says:

      You’re right, Michael. The concept of “expert” is a slippery one. But I don’t get exasperated about so many writers and so many styles; I get excited. And sometimes a little sad because I won’t have enough time to get to them all…

  3. Jim Kegley says:

    I have been a “published” writer since 1973. How? I started my own weekly newspaper in Ohio. I began writing a column for the newspaper with the first edition, February 8, 1973, and decided, since I had no developed skills, nor experience as a writer, I just decided to do it, warty words and all. Now, after 44-years, I’ve written over 2,200 columns, and if I truly find “warty words”, I use them.

    1. Rosanne Bane says:

      Congratulations, Jim, on recognizing a need and filling it for 44 years! 2,200 columns is an impressive amount of copy. You created your own on-the-job training program.

  4. Beth Barany says:

    Rosanne, I so agree with your post. I see so many authors tear their hair out under the pressure of getting it right. I have been there many times myself. Now I’m more often than not okay with good enough. It makes the whole creative process flow a lot nicer. And I’m happier!

    1. Rosanne Bane says:

      Thanks, Beth! It’s so hard to “get it right,” especially when “right” is a moving target. I’m in favor of whatever helps creativity flow. My family has found that happy writers are easier to live with. 😉

  5. Cyd Notter says:

    What a timely and welcome article. I’ve been wondering if the first eight chapters of my manuscript (I’ve only written eight so far) were ever going to be “good enough” to submit. I will strive to end the quest for perfection and the resulting paralysis. Signed, Future Risk Taker 🙂

    1. Rosanne Bane says:

      Kudos Future Risk Taker! I’m confident that if you continue to show up and attend to your manuscript regularly (it is so much easier to show up when you don’t demand and expect perfection) and stay open to discovering how to continue to develop as a writer, your manuscript will be good enough. I also predict you’ll have more fun along the way.
      P.S. I’ve found that surrendering the quest for perfection needs to be repeated from time to time — that’s part of the process, too.

  6. JOHN T. SHEA says:

    “Depending on which meme you look at, there are seven amateur, 10 fatal, 23 common, and 100 avoidable mistakes that are going to kill your first chapter, drive your editor crazy, or prove you’re a worthless wanna-be.”
    I’m always wary of such bombastically numbered lists, latter-day Commandments by Moses wannabees!

    “And even then, you can’t be sure because sometimes advisors with the best intentions make mistakes and give misdirected advice.”
    Because they’re human, with blind spots like mine, though hopefully not in the same place. If our faults are not the same we can help each other.

    I’ve recently encounter Carol Dweck’s Mindset writings, which emphasize effort and trial and error over any pre-existing, effortless ‘genius’. She concentrates on educating students, but we are all lifelong students and I found her ideas helpful though it’s quite a while since I was in a physical classroom.

    Thanks for this!

    1. Rosanne Bane says:

      You’re welcome, John, and thanks for your perspective. I agree that we can help and be helped by others whose faults and growing edge are different from our own. And I have long appreciated Carol Dweck’s insight.

  7. Alicea Jones says:

    Thanks for giving me another reason (and permission) to pick up my pen again!

    1. Rosanne Bane says:

      I’m so happy to hear you’ve got pen in hand again, Alicea!

  8. DREW DODDS says:

    i have been looking for direction as yes i wanted the perfect line, paragraph, chapter and so on.
    what a light bulb you have switched on . you cant revise empty sheets of paper.
    just do it , as you have proved , one gets stage fright and nothing happens for weeks.
    watch out for THE TIMEPIECE, coming to a book store near you many thanks DREW DODDS

    1. Rosanne Bane says:

      You’re welcome Drew! One of the reasons I commit to showing up for just 15 minutes is to mitigate stage fright. I commit to those 15 minutes, 5 days a week to avoid the multi-week gaps I used to have between writing sessions. I’ll watch for The Timepiece. Is it fiction or nonfiction?

  9. Rosanne Bane says:

    Thanks everyone for your comments! Don’t get me wrong, I appreciate royalty checks and paid gigs as much as the next writer, but there is a wonderful gratification in just knowing that my writing has made a small difference for another writer. It’s why I keep posting to my blog and guest posting to other blogs. Thanks BookBaby.com for the opportunity.

  10. RJ Bessonette says:

    Rosanne. I have found writing is much like being a musician. You practice, and practice, over and over trying to get it right. Then, come concert time. What if I make a mistake on that one part? Oh My!
    If you are afraid of a mistake, might as well join the audience and forget the long hours of practice.
    I love music, I love to write.. nothing like a good, entertaining story, or a good song. In my mind, I am a writer, not an author. Nothing can stop me from writing. Thanx for your timely tip.

Leave a Reply to Beth Barany Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *